Hipótesis metodológica para investigación transcultural
Resumo
En psicología y educación, el enfoque comparativo incluye el método transcultural. La falla de una investigación científica clara y precisa es uno de los problemas más serios en el estudio de las culturas. La educación, como proceso, necesita examinar intensamente las consecuencias de los objetivos educativos diseñados para una amplia serie de culturas y subculturas.
Downloads
Referências
Abel. T. Psychological testing in cultural contexts. New Haven. Conn: College and University Press, 1973.
Al-Issa. I. y Dennis W. (Eds.). Cross-cultural studies of beliavior. Nueva York: Holt-Rinehart Winston, 1970.
Anderson. A. Methodology of comparative education. International Review of Education. 1961. 7, 1-23.
Angelini. A. L. Perspectives and problems in cross-cultural research. Proceedings of Y11I Interamc-rican Congress of Psychology, 1964. 51-60.
Ardila R. y Finley. G. La psicología en Latinoamérica: una bibliografía. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 1975, 9. 1 171.
Backstron, C. y Hursh. G. Survey research. Chicago: Northwstern University Press, 1970.
Benedict, R. Patterns of culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1934.
Berry, J. Lonner, W. y Leroux, J. Director of cross-cultural research and researchers. Bellingham. Washington: Center for Cross-Cultural Research. 1973.
Berry. J. W. y Dasen. P. R. (Eds.). Culture and cognition: reading in cross-cultural psychology. Londres: Methuen, 1973.
Best. J. Research in education, Englewood Cliffs. N. J.: Prentice Mall, 1970.
Boas, F. The limitations of the comparative method in anthropology. Science, 1896, 4. 901-908.
Brameld, T. Patterns of educational philosophy. Nueva York: Holt-Rinehart Winston, 1971.
Brislin, R., Lonner, W. y Thordike, N. Cross-cultural research methods. Nueva York: Wiley. 1973.
Campbell. D. T. A cooperative multinational opinion sample exchange. Journal of Social Issues, 1968, 24, 245-258.
Campbell, D. T. y Stanley, J. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand Mc Nally, 1970.
Carey. R. Conceptual tools for research in comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 1966, 3. 416-425.
Dasen, P. Cross-cultural piagetian research: a summary. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology. 1972, 1/23-29.
Dawson. J. L. Research and theoretical bases of bio-social psychology. Gazette (Hong Kong). 1969. 16. 1-10.
Dawson, J. L., y Lonncr. W. J. (Eds.), Readings in cross-cultural psychology. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1975.
Dayton, M. Design of educational experiments. Nueva York: Me Graw-Hill, 1970.
Díaz-Guerrero. R. Sociocultural premises, attitudes and cross-cultural research. XVII International Congress of Psychology, Washington D. C., 1963.
Diaz-Guerrero, R. Hacia una teoria historica-bio-psicosocial del comportamiento Humano. México: Trillas, 1972.
Diaz-Guerrero, R. y Salas, M. El diferencial semántico del idioma español. México: Trillas, 1975.
Edwards, A. Techniques of attitudes scale construction. Nueva York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
Eggan, F. Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison. American Anthropologist. 1954. 5, 743 763.
Eide, I. (Ed.), Students as links between cultures: a cross-cultural survey based on UNESCO Studies. Oslo: Universitets-for-laget, 1970.
Ervin. S. M. Language and T.A.T. content in bilinguals. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1964. 68. 500-507.
Escotet, M. A. The measurement of student problems: a cross-cultural study in five nations. Tesis doctoral inédita. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska, 1972.
Escotet. M. A. Estadística psicoeducativa. México: Trillas, 1973 (a).
Escotet. M. A. A. comparison between Mexican-American and South American students: a cross-cultural study. Comparative and International Education Society, Annual Convention. San Antonio, March. 1973, 25-27. (b)
Escotet, M. A. Comparación entre estudiantes méxico-americanos (EE. UU.) y sudamericanos. Revista del Centro de Estudios Educativos (México), 1973, 4. 43-55. (c)
Escotet, M. A. y Díaz-Guerrero, R. (Eds.). Metodología de la investigación transcultural. México: Trillas, 1977, en prensa.
Ford, C. (Ed.). Cross-cultural approaches. New Haven: HRAF Press, 1967.
Frijda, N. y Jahoda. G. On the scope and methods of cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology. 1966. 1. 110-127.
Gezi. K. (Ed.). Education in comparative and international perspectives. Nueva York: Holt Rinehart Winston, 1971.
Guthrie, G. M. y cols. The psychology of modernization in the Philippines. Quezon City: Manila University Press, 1970.
Havighurst. R. J.. Dubois. M., Csikszcntmihaly, M., y Doll. R. A cross national study of Buenos Aires and Chicago adolescents. Basel: Vita Humana, 1965.
Heermann, E. y Braskamp. L. Readings in statistics for the behavioral sciences. Englewood Cliffs. N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970.
Helmstadter, G. C. Research concepts in human behavior. Nueva York: Appleton-Gentury-Crofts. 1970.
Hereford, C. y Natalicio. L. (Eds.). Aportaciones de la psicología a la investigación transcultural. México: Trillas, 1967.
Higson. J. M. The methodology of comparative analysis of education. Comparative Education Review, 1968. 3, 350 356.
Hobhouse, L. T., Wheeler. G. C., y Ginsberg, M. The material culture correlation. Londres: Chapman and Hall, 1915.
Holtzman. W. H. Cross-cultural research on personality development. Austin: Institute of Latin American Studies. Offprint Series, 25, 1968.
Holtzman. W. H. Cross-cultural studies in psychology. XIth Interamerican Congres of Psychology, 1967.
Holtzman, W. H., Díaz-Guerrero, R. y Swartz, Personality development in two cultures. Austin: University of Texas Press. 1975.
Insko, C. and Schopler. J. Experimental social psychology. Nueva York: Academic Press, 1972.
Kahl. J. The measurement of modernism. Austin: Institute of Latin American Studies. 1968.
Kaplan. B. (Ed.). Studying personality cross-culturnlly. Evanston. Illinois: Row. Peterson. 1961.
Kardiner, A. The individual and his society. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 1939.
Kazamias. A. Some old and new approaches to methodology in comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 1961, 96-96.
Kazamias, A. y Massialas, B. Tradición y cambio en la educación. México: Uteha, 1968.
Kelman, H. C. Psychological research on social change: some scientific and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Xth Interamerican Congress of Psychology. 1966. 53-66.
Köben, A. J. Comparativist, and non-comparativist in anthropology. En N. Naroll, y R. Cohen, (Eds.), A Handbook of method in cultural anthropology. Nueva York: The Natural History Press, 1970.
Köben, A. J. New ways of presenting an old idea: the statistical method in social anthropology. En F. Moore, (Ed.). Readings in cross-cultural methodology. New Haven: HRAF, 1961.
Lewis, 0. Comparisons in cultural anthropology. En N. Moore y W. Frank (Eds.), Readings in Cross-Cultural Methodology. New Haven: HRAF. 1961.
Lloyd, B. Perception and cognition: a cross-cultural perspective. Baltimore: Penguin. 1972.
Malinowski, B. Sex and repression in savage society. Nueva York: Harcourt Brace, 1927.
Manaster, G. J. y Havighurst, R. J. Cross-national research: social-psychological methods and problems. Boston. Mass: Houghton Mifflin. 1972.
Mc-Clelland. D. C. The achieving society. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1961.
Mc-Clelland, D. C. y Winter D. Motivating economic achievement. Nueva York: Free Press, 1959.
Mead, M. Coming of age in Samoa. Nueva York: William Morrow & Co.. 1928.
Mead. M. Anthropology: a human science. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1964.
Merritt, R. y Stein. R. (Eds.). Comparing nations: the use of quantitative data in cross-national research. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966.
Moehlman, A. Sistemas de educación comparados. Buenos Aires: Troquel, 1968.
Murdock, G. P. Correlations of matrilineal and patrilineal institutions. En Murdock, G. P. (Ed.), Studies in the science of society. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1937.
Murdock, G. P. Social structure. Nueva York: Mac-Millan. 1949.
Murdock. G. P. Sociology and anthropology. En Gill in. J. (Ed.), For a science of social man. Nueva York: MacMillan. 1954.
Murdock. G. P. The cross-cultural survey. En F. Moore (Ed.). Readings in cross-cultural methodology. New Haven: HRAF, 1961.
Nadel, S. F. The foundations of social anthropology. Nueva York: Free Press. 1951.
Naroll. R. Cross-cultural sampling. En R. Naroll, y R. Cohen. R. (Eds.), Handbook of method in cultural anthropology. Nueva York: The Natural History Press. 1970.
Nieboer, H. J. Slavery as an industrial system. The Hague: Nijhoff. 1910.
Noah, H. y Eckstein, M. Toward a science of comparative education. Nueva York: MacMillan. 1969.
Nunally. T. Psychometric theory. Nueva York: Mc-Graw Hill, 1967.
Osgood, C. E. The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 1952, 49, 197-237.
Osgood, C. E. Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 10-28.
Osgood, C. E. Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures. American Anthropologist. 1964. 3, 171-200.
Osgood C. E.. Suci, G. J. y Tannenbaum, P. H. The measurement of meaning. Urbana, 111 University of Illinois Press, 1957.
Osgood, C. E. Archer, W. K. y Miron, M. S. The cross-cultural generality of meaning systems. Urbana, 111: University of Illinois, 1963 (mimeo).
Pelto. P. J. Anthropological research. Nueva York: Harper & Row, 1970.
Price-Williams. D. R. (Ed.), Cross-Cultural studies. Baltimore: Penguin, 1970.
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. The comparative method in anthropology. Journal of the Royal Anthopological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1951. 1, 15-22.
Rivers, W. H. Observations on the senses of the TODAS. British Journal of Psychology, 1905, 1, 321-396.
Rokkan, S., Verba, S.. Viet, J.. y Almasy. E. Comparative survey analysis. Paris: Mouton, 1969
Schcrmerhorn, R. A. Comparative ethnic relations: a framework for theory and research. Nueva York: Random House. 1970.
Sears. R. R. Transcultural variables and conceptual equivalence. En 13. Kaplan (Ed.), Studying personality cross-cultunaliy. Evanston, 111: Row. Peterson and Company, 1961.
Segail, M. H., Campbell, D. T. y Herskovits, M. J. Cultural differences in the perception of geometric illusions. Science, 1963, 139, 769-771.
Sheridan, C. L. Fundamentals of experimental psychology. Nueva York: Holt-Rinehart Winston, 1971.
Siegel, S. Non parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Nueva York: Mc Graw-Hill, 1956.
Spaulding, S. Research on content, methods, and techniques in education for development. Review of Educational Research. 1968, 3, 277-292.
Strodtbeck, F. L. Cross-cultural research. Proceedings of Xth Interamerican Congress of Psychology, 1965.
Triandis, H. Attitude and attitude change. Nueva York: Wiley, 1971.
Triandis, H. C., Malpass, R. S. y Davidson, A. U. Cross-cultural psychology. Biennial Review of Anthropology, 1971.
Triandis, H. C., Malpass, R. S. y Davidson, A. II. Psychology and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 1973, 24, 355-378.
Tylor, E. B. On a method or investigating the development of institutions: applied to laws of marriage and descent. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1889, 18, 245-272.
Vogel, A., Zepper, J. y Bachelor, D. (Eds.), Foundations of education: a social view. Albuquerque: University of New México Press, 1970.
Walsh. J. Social science: cancellation of Camelot after row in Chile brings research under scruting. Science, VI.65, 149. 1.211-1.213.
Whiting, J. Methods and problems in cross-cultural research. En N. Lindzey, y G. Aroonson (Eds). Handbook of social psychology. Reading. Mass: Addison Wesley, 1970.
Whiting, J. y Whiting, B. B. Contributions of anthropology of the methods of studying child rearing. En P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in child development. Nueva York: Wiley, 1960.
Whiting, B. B. (Ed.). Six cultures: studies in child rearing. Nueva York: Wiley, 1963.
Wolf, R. The measurement of environments. In C. Harris (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1964 Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1965.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 1978 REVISTA INTERAMERICANA DE EDUCACION DE ADULTOS
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
1. Política propuesta para revistas de acceso abierto
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
1. Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial-Compartir igual 4.0 .de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
2. Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (vea The Effect of Open Access).
